 |
AppletTalk.com Java discussions newsgroups
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
asj Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 5:09 pm Post subject: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
I'm looking through the local papers (Star Ledger) this morning, and
lo and behold, I see a story that an entire police department in
Boston had standardized on using Java-based BlackBerry handhelds to
access police databases while on the field! Coming up so soon after
another story I noticed that the USPS was also standardizing on these
handhelds and converting all their apps to Java apps, this really hits
home the fact that RIM has a real winner here - a winner that is
totally Java-based!
I don't have a Blackberry, but from emulators and just the pics they
do not seem as "cool" as Palms or Windows handhelds. And yet, these
handhelds seem to have grown the fastest in 2003, a testament to the
fact that business users aren't as blinded by the "cool gadget" factor
as the normal geeks who litter Javaspace (Hello, Russell).
The hopeful thing to note is that departments and organizations always
like simplicity and usefulness, and especially robustness, and word of
mouth about the Blackberry probably is very strong after its success
at the USPS during the NorthEast blackout, and after other successes
like its use in various police departments and such. Overall, this is
a very good sign for Java not only dominating the mobile phone market,
but also encroaching on the handheld market via a surprise route - the
RIM way.
Java developers keep moaning over the fact that J2ME support on Palm
and Windows handhelds isn't what it could be. Perhaps it's time to
ditch those lazy bum handhelds in the enterprise and push a product
that not only is the fastest growing handheld out there, but which is
completely committed to Java.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roedy Green Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 5:55 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
On 25 Jun 2004 10:09:39 -0700, [email]asj (AT) blueboard (DOT) com[/email] (asj) wrote or quoted
:
| Quote: | I don't have a Blackberry, but from emulators and just the pics they
do not seem as "cool" as Palms or Windows handhelds.
|
The coolness is not what makes a police department pick a Blackberry.
The ease of development of custom apps, with some serious growing room
does.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carlos Bazzarella Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:17 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
RIM's Java based Blackberry is the only J2ME implementation
that does *not* support 5 way navigation !!! All you can do
is use the "thumb wheel", and to do that you must change your
code to work *only* on their devices !!! Another thing is that
Blackberry only supports MIDP 1.0 (which the spec. was
released in 1999), nowadays every new device comes with
support for MIDP 2.0.
Carlos.
asj wrote:
| Quote: | I'm looking through the local papers (Star Ledger) this morning, and
lo and behold, I see a story that an entire police department in
Boston had standardized on using Java-based BlackBerry handhelds to
access police databases while on the field! Coming up so soon after
another story I noticed that the USPS was also standardizing on these
handhelds and converting all their apps to Java apps, this really hits
home the fact that RIM has a real winner here - a winner that is
totally Java-based!
I don't have a Blackberry, but from emulators and just the pics they
do not seem as "cool" as Palms or Windows handhelds. And yet, these
handhelds seem to have grown the fastest in 2003, a testament to the
fact that business users aren't as blinded by the "cool gadget" factor
as the normal geeks who litter Javaspace (Hello, Russell).
The hopeful thing to note is that departments and organizations always
like simplicity and usefulness, and especially robustness, and word of
mouth about the Blackberry probably is very strong after its success
at the USPS during the NorthEast blackout, and after other successes
like its use in various police departments and such. Overall, this is
a very good sign for Java not only dominating the mobile phone market,
but also encroaching on the handheld market via a surprise route - the
RIM way.
Java developers keep moaning over the fact that J2ME support on Palm
and Windows handhelds isn't what it could be. Perhaps it's time to
ditch those lazy bum handhelds in the enterprise and push a product
that not only is the fastest growing handheld out there, but which is
completely committed to Java.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roedy Green Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:43 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:17:08 -0400, Carlos Bazzarella
<cbazzaTAKE (AT) OUTpoliplus (DOT) com> wrote or quoted :
| Quote: | All you can do
is use the "thumb wheel", and to do that you must change your
code to work *only* on their devices !!! Another thing is that
Blackberry only supports MIDP 1.0 (which the spec. was
released in 1999), nowadays every new device comes with
support for MIDP 2.0.
|
sounds like they are taking a leaf from the pages of Microsoft and the
bad old IBM.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grant Wagner Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:11 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
Which speaks to the fact that the Blackberry is the right device, with the
right features, at the right time, for the right price. It offers PDA, text
messaging and cell phone capability in a single device for what is
considered by business to be a reasonable price. It has nothing to do with
the technology involved. Blackberries could run DOS 2.0 and no one at my
wife's company would care as long as they got their system failure notices
and phone calls on a timely basis.
The only people who care that the Blackberry is a 100% Java device are
techo-geeks, everyone else just wants stuff to work the way they want it to
work.
Carlos Bazzarella wrote:
| Quote: | RIM's Java based Blackberry is the only J2ME implementation
that does *not* support 5 way navigation !!! All you can do
is use the "thumb wheel", and to do that you must change your
code to work *only* on their devices !!! Another thing is that
Blackberry only supports MIDP 1.0 (which the spec. was
released in 1999), nowadays every new device comes with
support for MIDP 2.0.
Carlos.
asj wrote:
I'm looking through the local papers (Star Ledger) this morning, and
lo and behold, I see a story that an entire police department in
Boston had standardized on using Java-based BlackBerry handhelds to
access police databases while on the field! Coming up so soon after
another story I noticed that the USPS was also standardizing on these
handhelds and converting all their apps to Java apps, this really hits
home the fact that RIM has a real winner here - a winner that is
totally Java-based!
I don't have a Blackberry, but from emulators and just the pics they
do not seem as "cool" as Palms or Windows handhelds. And yet, these
handhelds seem to have grown the fastest in 2003, a testament to the
fact that business users aren't as blinded by the "cool gadget" factor
as the normal geeks who litter Javaspace (Hello, Russell).
The hopeful thing to note is that departments and organizations always
like simplicity and usefulness, and especially robustness, and word of
mouth about the Blackberry probably is very strong after its success
at the USPS during the NorthEast blackout, and after other successes
like its use in various police departments and such. Overall, this is
a very good sign for Java not only dominating the mobile phone market,
but also encroaching on the handheld market via a surprise route - the
RIM way.
Java developers keep moaning over the fact that J2ME support on Palm
and Windows handhelds isn't what it could be. Perhaps it's time to
ditch those lazy bum handhelds in the enterprise and push a product
that not only is the fastest growing handheld out there, but which is
completely committed to Java.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roedy Green Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:33 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:11:22 GMT, Grant Wagner
<gwagner (AT) agricoreunited (DOT) com> wrote or quoted :
| Quote: | The only people who care that the Blackberry is a 100% Java device are
techo-geeks, everyone else just wants stuff to work the way they want it to
work.
|
I think you are underestimating the Java aspect. A Palm Pilot
application will be sold to perhaps hundreds of thousands of users.
You can amortise the programming cost over many users. When you write
a custom app, you may only have 1 to 100 or so users. You need a much
cheaper way of producing custom programs than you do mass market ones.
Writing for tiny devices is usually EXTREMELY device specific and you
are clawing for every byte of ROM/RAM. The Blackberry loosens that up
considerably. Further, it lets you do your development on very
ordinary desktop hardware with relatively ordinary programmers.
The Blackberry has hit a sweetspot -- sufficient RAM so you can
breathe, a believable keyboard, integrated cellphone/connectivity and
a believable price.
I've been rooting for them since day one because they were Canadian,
and I love blackberries, my "totem" plant. Not only do they produce
abundant delicious free fruit, they are so tough they are one of the
few species likely to survive a nuclear war. I root for the
blackberries tearing up abandoned parking lots. To me, they symbolise
the robustness of life.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roedy Green Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:42 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:33:43 GMT, Roedy Green
<look-on (AT) mindprod (DOT) com.invalid> wrote or quoted :
| Quote: |
The Blackberry has hit a sweetspot -- sufficient RAM so you can
breathe, a believable keyboard, integrated cellphone/connectivity and
a believable price.
|
It also has a mystique a bit like the old Volkswagen. It is a bit
deliberately homely looking.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jim Sculley Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:58 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
Roedy Green wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:33:43 GMT, Roedy Green
[email]look-on (AT) mindprod (DOT) com.inva[/email]lid> wrote or quoted :
The Blackberry has hit a sweetspot -- sufficient RAM so you can
breathe, a believable keyboard, integrated cellphone/connectivity and
a believable price.
It also has a mystique a bit like the old Volkswagen. It is a bit
deliberately homely looking.
|
I liken it to talking into a piece of toast.
Jim S.
--
Remove my extraneous mandibular appendages to reply via email.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carlos Bazzarella Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 12:08 am Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
Techno-geeks are the ones releasing applications and look around
and you won't find many for the Blackberry !!! Great device if
all you want is email. Back when, NextStep was wonderful, too
bad all apps were being developed for Windows instead. We all
know what happened then. So for the less informed, standard
Java J2ME 2.0 compatibility is extremely important to be able
to run current software that is being developed by the techno-geeks.
Carlos.
Grant Wagner wrote:
| Quote: | Which speaks to the fact that the Blackberry is the right device, with the
right features, at the right time, for the right price. It offers PDA, text
messaging and cell phone capability in a single device for what is
considered by business to be a reasonable price. It has nothing to do with
the technology involved. Blackberries could run DOS 2.0 and no one at my
wife's company would care as long as they got their system failure notices
and phone calls on a timely basis.
The only people who care that the Blackberry is a 100% Java device are
techo-geeks, everyone else just wants stuff to work the way they want it to
work.
Carlos Bazzarella wrote:
RIM's Java based Blackberry is the only J2ME implementation
that does *not* support 5 way navigation !!! All you can do
is use the "thumb wheel", and to do that you must change your
code to work *only* on their devices !!! Another thing is that
Blackberry only supports MIDP 1.0 (which the spec. was
released in 1999), nowadays every new device comes with
support for MIDP 2.0.
Carlos.
asj wrote:
I'm looking through the local papers (Star Ledger) this morning, and
lo and behold, I see a story that an entire police department in
Boston had standardized on using Java-based BlackBerry handhelds to
access police databases while on the field! Coming up so soon after
another story I noticed that the USPS was also standardizing on these
handhelds and converting all their apps to Java apps, this really hits
home the fact that RIM has a real winner here - a winner that is
totally Java-based!
I don't have a Blackberry, but from emulators and just the pics they
do not seem as "cool" as Palms or Windows handhelds. And yet, these
handhelds seem to have grown the fastest in 2003, a testament to the
fact that business users aren't as blinded by the "cool gadget" factor
as the normal geeks who litter Javaspace (Hello, Russell).
The hopeful thing to note is that departments and organizations always
like simplicity and usefulness, and especially robustness, and word of
mouth about the Blackberry probably is very strong after its success
at the USPS during the NorthEast blackout, and after other successes
like its use in various police departments and such. Overall, this is
a very good sign for Java not only dominating the mobile phone market,
but also encroaching on the handheld market via a surprise route - the
RIM way.
Java developers keep moaning over the fact that J2ME support on Palm
and Windows handhelds isn't what it could be. Perhaps it's time to
ditch those lazy bum handhelds in the enterprise and push a product
that not only is the fastest growing handheld out there, but which is
completely committed to Java.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Shelton Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 6:43 am Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:42:01 GMT, Roedy Green wrote:
| Quote: | On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:33:43 GMT, Roedy Green
[email]look-on (AT) mindprod (DOT) com.inva[/email]lid> wrote or quoted :
The Blackberry has hit a sweetspot -- sufficient RAM so you can
breathe, a believable keyboard, integrated cellphone/connectivity and
a believable price.
It also has a mystique a bit like the old Volkswagen. It is a bit
deliberately homely looking.
|
Hey! Be careful what you say about old Volkswagens! I have two of them, a
1967 Beetle (my daily driver) and 1961 Ragtop (Beetle with a folding cloth
sun roof - which is my project car). If I could I'd have a lot more of
them - they are great fun, and not the least bit homely, IMO.
--
Tom Shelton
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asj Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:57 am Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
Carlos Bazzarella <cbazzaTAKE (AT) OUTpoliplus (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Techno-geeks are the ones releasing applications and look around
and you won't find many for the Blackberry !!! Great device if
all you want is email. Back when, NextStep was wonderful, too
bad all apps were being developed for Windows instead. We all
know what happened then. So for the less informed, standard
Java J2ME 2.0 compatibility is extremely important to be able
to run current software that is being developed by the techno-geeks.
|
Carlos:
Blackberry is not going soon, if that's what you're worried about. It
actually was one of the (if not the fastest) fastest growing handheld
since last year.
And businesses will gravitate to producing apps if there is a market
for it, not just because geeks like playing around with the darn
thing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asj Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:57 am Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
Carlos Bazzarella <cbazzaTAKE (AT) OUTpoliplus (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: | Techno-geeks are the ones releasing applications and look around
and you won't find many for the Blackberry !!! Great device if
all you want is email. Back when, NextStep was wonderful, too
bad all apps were being developed for Windows instead. We all
know what happened then. So for the less informed, standard
Java J2ME 2.0 compatibility is extremely important to be able
to run current software that is being developed by the techno-geeks.
|
Carlos:
Blackberry is not going soon, if that's what you're worried about. It
actually was one of the (if not the fastest) fastest growing handheld
since last year.
And businesses will gravitate to producing apps if there is a market
for it, not just because geeks like playing around with the darn
thing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Grant Wagner Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
asj wrote:
| Quote: | Carlos Bazzarella <cbazzaTAKE (AT) OUTpoliplus (DOT) com> wrote
Techno-geeks are the ones releasing applications and look around
and you won't find many for the Blackberry !!! Great device if
all you want is email. Back when, NextStep was wonderful, too
bad all apps were being developed for Windows instead. We all
know what happened then. So for the less informed, standard
Java J2ME 2.0 compatibility is extremely important to be able
to run current software that is being developed by the techno-geeks.
Carlos:
Blackberry is not going soon, if that's what you're worried about. It
actually was one of the (if not the fastest) fastest growing handheld
since last year.
|
Personally I'm not worried about them going away. My point was that their success is in no way due to the
technical superiority (or lack thereof) of Java. It is simply a device that gives humans what they need, when
they need it. It also has a certain industry "buzz" about it, making it "trendy" and "cool" to carry a
Blackberry. None of it's engineered features, nor the buzz, has anything to do with Java.
| Quote: | And businesses will gravitate to producing apps if there is a market
for it, not just because geeks like playing around with the darn
thing.
|
Businesses would gravitate to producing apps if the Blackberry ran "Blackberry Programming Environment Alpha
0.713" and you needed a special IDE from Blackberry to program the thing. The success of the device is because
the device does the right things, at the right point in history, for the right price. Although the price _can_
probably be attributed to Java to some extent. If RIM had had to develop their own programming environment the
cost of that would have to have been included in the retail cost of the device.
--
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
asj Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 1:30 am Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
Grant Wagner <gwagner (AT) agricoreunited (DOT) com> wrote
| Quote: |
Personally I'm not worried about them going away. My point was that their success is in no way due to the
technical superiority (or lack thereof) of Java. It is simply a device that gives humans what they need, when
|
well, you'll get no argument from me. i never said they are successful
BECAUSE of java (although i'm sure the licensing terms are better than
what microsoft or palm would give them), and i actually don't CARE.
the point is that they are a java-based handheld that is helping
spread java - now that, i care about.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roedy Green Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 2:19 am Post subject: Re: The hidden success of Java handhelds |
|
|
On 29 Jun 2004 18:30:57 -0700, [email]asj (AT) blueboard (DOT) com[/email] (asj) wrote or quoted
:
| Quote: | well, you'll get no argument from me. i never said they are successful
BECAUSE of java (although i'm sure the licensing terms are better than
what microsoft or palm would give them), and i actually don't CARE.
the point is that they are a java-based handheld that is helping
spread java - now that, i care about.
|
With Java it becomes much more feasible to create an integrated range
of products designed to run on handheld, server, and desktop. There
cane be code sharing. Intercommunication is easier. You can use one
programming team for everything.
It becomes much more feasible to tack on yet another platform and
intermediate feature set at the last minute depending on what's hot.
In the old days, pretty well every platform size had to be tackled
completely from scratch. Up front, you had to decide your CPU and
your ROM/RAM size and that was cast in stone.
There is another problem Java solves. Let's say for example you
decided to create a physician's amanuensis to track drug costs and
interactions. As development proceeds, you discover this thing will
not shoehorn into a Palm Pilot. In the old days, programmers clawed
back functionality to scrimp every byte to force it to fit. There was
ZERO room for any additional functionality no matter how the marketing
boys screamed. To produce version 1.1 required a rewrite to a new
platform or heroic ram-saving measures. Now it is possible to delay
the decision of best hardware to later in the development cycle. You
don't box yourself in.
You further have the option of offloading some of the functionality to
the desktop or a server. You don't have to start over from scratch to
shift the functionality. You can adjust it as you go if you see you
erred in your estimates.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|